Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdhorsing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crowdhorsing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism and possibly a hoax. jfd34 (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Probably a joke. If not, it's a non-notable neologism whose sole purpose is to advertise a website (which itself looks like a joke or a scam). Pichpich (talk) 12:08, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 12. Snotbot t • c » 12:11, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, but most of all: Wikipedia is not a place for things made up one day. (At least not unless it's covered in multiple independent and reliable sources, which this term is most assuredly NOT.)Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a dumb joke. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per comments above. There are no external sources. A Google search leads to the name of a blogger. This page is not suitable for Wikipedia unless the term becomes used more widely and is reported in reliable independent sources. Kooky2 (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.